AI tools don't materially change how a company runs

Most companies have access to the same models and tools. The hard part is deciding where work should change, building the new way of working while the business keeps moving, and measuring whether the change pays off

Canopy.

The platform we build inside your company, not next to it. Your team runs it after we leave.

Loop creates a loop between customer input and delivery so long tail customer complaints are always being addressed 

Chronicle scans an entire companies codebase to deploy agents into refactoring dormant respositories

Puck Code helps break down to workflows into specs and then eventually into code that agents can write. 

Where the return actually comes from.

Team

Between us, we've sat on the boards and in the leadership seats deciding where AI investment goes. We scope every engagement to a financial outcome.

{{ person.name }}

{{ person.role }}

{{ person.bio }}

If your board is asking the AI question, we should talk.

Why we can underwrite this at all.

Our transformation practice is inside these companies every week, watching where the operating model actually breaks. That vantage point is what lets us underwrite conviction other capital can't.

How we build conviction.

We underwrite top-down, from the org chart and the operating model, not the pitch. Our transformation practice runs the change hands-on before we invest. Where conviction is highest, we invest and operate ourselves.

Team

{{ person.name }}

{{ person.role }}

{{ person.bio }}

If your board is asking the AI question, we should talk.